Not really sure about this one. I can find lots of passing mentions but nothing really that constitutes both a reliable source and non-trivial coverage about the organisation itself. Discuss. Basaliskinspect damage⁄berate 17:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Reading the Swedish-language version of this article it seems apparent that this is a notable organization that has several other major organizations among its membership. It obviously needs to be expanded and referenced. __meco (talk) 20:50, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Do you have any sources? I had trouble finding suitable ones but I don't know if that's just me being a bonehead. Basaliskinspect damage⁄berate 20:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
I've just looked at the article you're talking about, and if it's this that you're referring to, I have to disagree with you. The text of that article doesn't indicate notability anymore than the article here, and it, too, is completely unreferenced. Notability is based on in-depth coverage by independent third-party sources, not claims of importance on another WikiMedia project. Basaliskinspect damage⁄berate 20:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)