The given page title was invalid or had an inter-language or inter-wiki prefix.
It may contain one or more characters which cannot be used in titles.
- View log • ) – (
- (Find sources: )
The article, which appears to be largely or perhaps exclusively the creation of the subject and related parties, appears to be essentially promotional in nature. While the subject does have a local radio show (with internet syndication), there is a marked scarcity of reliable 3d party sources discussing the subject, and for that reason the article appears to fail the basic tests of WP:BIO. A PROD template was quickly removed by an anon editor, without explanation or improvement to the article. A prior article by the same name was deleted in 2005 but it is not clear that the earlier article concerned this same individual. JohnInDC (talk) 02:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Additional note - The IP editor did subsequently add a couple of references, not really on point and only one of them independent of the subject, but my prior observation that the editor did not improve the article at all is no longer true. JohnInDC (talk) 02:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
| This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Articles for deletion/Scott Weinberg (2nd nomination), that was deleted or is being discussed for deletion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.