The given page title was invalid or had an inter-language or inter-wiki prefix.
It may contain one or more characters which cannot be used in titles.
- View log • ) – (
- (Find sources: )
Entry is not worthy of wikipedia page (Notability, based on WP:NOTE and WP:CORP) and seems to have become a running argument between two parties which is beneath wikipedia.
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 16. Snotbot t • c » 16:31, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment – I have to point out that "a running argument between two parties" is all too typical of what wikipedia is about. But in this case it doesn't appear relevant as an AfD criteria. Regards, RJH (talk) 17:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia has dispute resolution practices. I don't recall article deletion being part of that process. I don't believe any attempt has been made to resolve any disputes for this pages.--Zepheydog (talk) 22:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The only reference with in-depth coverage doesn't actually mention the name of this company. A move to FotoMedia might be worth considering if more refs come to light. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
| This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Articles for deletion/Scenera Research (2nd nomination), that was deleted or is being discussed for deletion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.