FANDOM


IRows

AfDs for this article:

    The given page title was invalid or had an inter-language or inter-wiki prefix.

    It may contain one or more characters which cannot be used in titles.

IRows (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: "IRows"news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

I am opening this discussion in response to a request for technical help from Elbowin (talk<dot-separator>contribs<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/<dot-separator>Template:User-multi/). Rationale copied from his/her talk page is as follows: "It is about a piece of software which never went beyond beta stage and is irrelevant as such. The old discussion claims some kind of "historic" relevance, but this cannot not be taken from the article as it stands. I found this article browsing through the category:Ajax (programming) and was very dissappointed of it. Version history shows that the article is probably an orphan and no one cares about it. On the other hand, I found in category:JavaScript the article Medireview very good reading: That's how to deal with history of computing."

I am neutral. —KuyaBriBriTalk 13:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep – The topic is passing WP:GNG, per:
Northamerica1000(talk) 01:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Big software firms acquire smaller ones, programmers change their employers. This event creates a ripple in the press. What makes this case notable? How is it reflected in the article? Elbowin (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Articles for deletion/IRows (2nd nomination), that was deleted or is being discussed for deletion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Author(s): The Bushranger Search for "Articles for deletion/IRows (2nd nomination)" on Google
View Wikipedia's deletion log of "Articles for deletion/IRows (2nd nomination)"
Wikipedia-logo-v2

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.