The given page title was invalid or had an inter-language or inter-wiki prefix.
It may contain one or more characters which cannot be used in titles.
- View log • ) – (
- (Find sources: )
This failed proposal, like dozens of other transit system plans which made a few news stories and later vaporised, is unlikely to have any lasting importance, and does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Latest mention in news sources I could find was this article (in Thai) from 19 April 2011, which describes how the project was meeting difficulties and was unlikely to be able to continue. Paul_012 (talk) 16:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm. I'd feel more comfortable voting to delete if we actually had a source saying it was canceled. I couldn't find any either. We might compress this article into a sentence at Bangkok#Rail systems. --BDD (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 22:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
| This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Articles for deletion/Grand Square Monorail (2nd nomination), that was deleted or is being discussed for deletion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.