FANDOM


CILEx London Branch

CILEx London Branch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: "CILEx London Branch"news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Seems a very clear case of WP:NOTINHERITED Branches or Sub-Groups of notable organisations are not notable in themselves unless there is some independent reliable sourcing that discussed the branch in some detail. I'm seeing lots of self-publicity in google but not so much independent coverage. Spartaz Humbug! 09:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete All mentions (outside ClLEx's own website) of the London branch that I could find after ten minutes of Googling were just passing mentions, mostly from social networkng sites. I would expect a notable present-day organisation to appear in Google results. Also, none of the references supplied are independent of CILEx. Hence fails WP:GNG.—A bit iffy (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Articles for deletion/CILEx London Branch, that was deleted or is being discussed for deletion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Author(s): A bit iffy Search for "Articles for deletion/CILEx London Branch" on Google
View Wikipedia's deletion log of "Articles for deletion/CILEx London Branch"
Wikipedia-logo-v2

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.