2012 I-League U20

2012 I-League U20 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: "2012 I-League U20"news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Contested PROD. Concern was Non-notable youth competition. PROD was contested without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason: Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

2011 I-League U19 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete – doesn't appear to be covered in any reliable third-party source. Fails WP:GNG. Kosm1fent 13:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep - just because I think it's unfair to nominate this when our Indian expert (Arsenalkid) is on a one month block. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
    • Lol what? Aren't there any other Indian editors around?! Kosm1fent 13:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - Mentoz, that's not a valid reason to keep an article. These articles fail WP:GNG; any meaningful content beyond sports results (of which there is minimum) should be merged with the I-League U20 parent article. GiantSnowman 13:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
    • I'm just saying that nominating these articles when the article creator is blocked, is not fair play as he cannot participate in the discussion. I would hope that this nomination could be withdrawn, and when Arsenalkid is unblocked it can be nominated once again (and in that discussion I will definately vote delete). There are no valid reasons to keep the article, but there aren't any valid reasons to delete the article now and not wait one month. Mentoz86 (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
      • Mentoz86, if the block was unwarranted (which I haven't investigated) then there are ways to appeal it, but, in the meantime, the rest of us have to get on with our primary task of developing this encyclopedia, which includes discussing article deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep – I have added more references to sources that have covered this youth tournament. Am still new to this, so I am not sure if this will be enough to pass WP:GNG rule. Thanx. Aruncito (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to the main leagues page, no need for individual seasons to have a seperate article.Seasider91 (talk) 16:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Articles for deletion/2012 I-League U20, that was deleted or is being discussed for deletion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Author(s): Phil Bridger Search for "Articles for deletion/2012 I-League U20" on Google
View Wikipedia's deletion log of "Articles for deletion/2012 I-League U20"

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.