2004–2009 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: "2004–2009"news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable compilation, no sources JayJayTalk to me 01:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Weak keep. It is notable. Just highly unsourced. Farine (talk) 05:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

How is notable if there are no sources to support that claim. JayJayTalk to me 01:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete as sources don't seem to exist. Dennis Brown - © 01:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Articles for deletion/2004–2009, that was deleted or is being discussed for deletion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Author(s): JayJay Search for "Articles for deletion/2004–2009" on Google
View Wikipedia's deletion log of "Articles for deletion/2004–2009"

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.